Saturday, December 3, 2011

More Dislike BiEn/Ameno in the Eve of 13th GE

By: Cicit Hj Mohamad Perak/Cucu Hj Md Amin

Thursday 1st Dec 2011, Iskandar went to PWTC to see the Ameno’s men and women. When he reached level where Dewan Merdeka was, he had asked the guard on duty where the Dewan Merdeka was.

“Here Encik,” he said.

“Oh, okay,” Iskandar responded.

He went round from Level 1 to Level 3. He perceived that all the Ameno’s members and representative looked naïve and lack of knowledge. Suddenly, he saw Shehiden Kaseem in at the door or Dewan Merdeka looked very busy. Huh, all of them were pretenders, Iskandar whispered to himself.

By 1.15 pm he left the PWTC. No doubt, in this coming PR13 BiEn/Ameno would collapse if that the scenario seen.

On fine morning of 2nd Dec 2011 Iskandar was near Sogo KL facing Restaurant the Ship waiting for a taxi to go to Damn Height for training. Normally, in the afternoon when he was there, there were many taxis queuing until Jalan TAR. But that morning no taxi at all until ten minutes later. Iskandar was the only one standing there. Two taxis just passed him. Suddenly another two men queued behind him. The third taxi anyhow stopped but a few meters in front of him at the left. He entered the taxi and sat beside the driver.

“Sorry Encik, I thought you are Ameno man, “the driver talked spontaneously.

He said then why? The driver taxi said he dislike Ameno man too much. Oh, that was why the two earlier taxis just passed him without stopping.

According to him, although he was only a taxi driver, he knew which was wrong which was right. He further said, Ameno has done much damage to the Malays and Islam. Ameno has treated the Malays like all the Malays are too naïve.

“I’m closed and know the Cow Lady’s mother. A selfish lady, she never has said that her family is Malay descendant. She is too proud of being the Arabic origin,” said the taxi driver. Iskandar only listened, because he is a good listener especially for topics that he interested in.

Then he said about the Piem’s mother. The taxi driver called her as untie only, not said as TiPi or whatever her status or rank. She told him, she always cry and feel sad because her sons were not like their late good father. To the youngest son’s wife although a Malay, found cooking and eating a ‘forbidden meat’. She had seen that and awared of the incident. Iskandar hope, it was untrue and a slander! Otherwise, nauzubillah!

While the husband when talking never talking in Malay. He 24 hours speaks London showing way of living that they all modernized and westernized. To him, Malay is not up to the standard. A Malay man is considered lazy and naïve compared to the Chinese in the Bolehland.

At the end of the General Assembly, Piem, the eldest son had said he had swearing 4 times of slander and libel accused to him including in the mosques. For information, Prophet Muhammad had never swearing in his life and he really not encouraged that.

Remember a story on his wife Aishah? In an incident Muhammad had asked her to swear in front of him that she did not do any wrong (adultery) on him. Aishah said why should swear because she knew she was right and Allah knew all. Further story just ask the ustad okay?

Today, if dared to swear, it is useless then we to have the judges and the courts in the country, since swearing is sufficient.

People tend to swear when there is no alternative to sustain his power and luxury life. For example a man had killed another man or woman consciously, usually be sentenced to death under Section 302 of the Penal Code. In order to continue surviving surely he dares to do the swearing as long as he could survive rather than to be hanged or sentenced for life or losing all!

At end of the assembly, Zeheed had shown several researches related to Piem. About 59% Malays supported the present Piem! Who is the researcher, did he not bias? Who were the respondents? Using sample random sampling, or stratified? Did the researcher do his research according to the research analysis methodologies? Among others are such as testing of reliability and validity, cronbach’s alpha, etc.

Winnable candidate only could be chosen? Although, are the candidates not sincere and trustworthy? In conclusion, Ameno must have candidates as many as Ise Semed Felde as stressed by the Piem.

Kindly change today’s government, we try a new government. Is it wrong trying? Is only transformational the best? Re-formational and transactional are not good? Are all the newest good? And all the oldest are not and to be thrashed out?

More or less this Ameno GE, they all are really like the Quraisyi-kafireen followers and leaders during Prophet Muhammad’s time prior Mecca administered by Islam.

No comments: